New Survey Data Reveals Rise of GLP-1 Drug Claims, With Utilization Management and Eligibility Requirements as Leading Cost-Control Mechanisms  

A new survey report from the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans reveals updated U.S. employer coverage and claims representation surrounding glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) drugs. The International Foundation first conducted this survey in October 2023 and again in May 2024.  

Employers indicated the following coverage for GLP-1 drugs: 

  • 55% provide coverage for diabetes only (down from 57% in 2024) 
  • 36% provide coverage for both diabetes and weight loss (up from 34% in 2024). 

Of those currently offering GLP-1 drug coverage only for diabetes, 17% are considering offering the drugs for weight loss (down from 19% in 2024). 

Percentage of Annual Claims 

The average representation of GLP-1 drugs used for weight loss in total annual claims was 10.5% for 2025, an increase over the 2024 average of 8.9% and the 2023 average of 6.9%. Twenty-seven percent of employers reported GLP-1 drug costs to be more than 15% of their annual claims. 

When I spoke to Julie Stich, CEBS, Vice President of Content at the International Foundation, she observed, “This new survey data shows that over the past two years, GLP-1 claims have continued to rise, reflecting a sustained interest in these drugs as both a weight loss and diabetes treatment. Organizations are balancing the ongoing demand from employees for GLP-1 coverage for weight loss by continuing to explore feasibility through cost-control mechanisms.”  

Utilization Management  

Of those covering GLP-1 drugs, 78% of employers are using utilization management as a cost-control mechanism. Out of those that use utilization management as a cost-control mechanism:  

  • 96% require prior authorization  
  • 26% require reauthorization for refills 
  • 14% use a physician-led approach 
  • 5% limit prescribers by type 
  • 3% limit prescribers to a telehealth/virtual care vendor. 

Eligibility Requirements 

Eligibility requirements, used by 68% of employers covering GLP-1 drugs, continue to be heavily relied upon as a cost-control option. The most prevalent eligibility requirements include: 

  • Minimum body mass index (BMI) (88%) 
  • Obesity with one other chronic disease (60%) 
  • Obesity and type 2 diabetes (34%) 
  • Obesity with two or more other chronic diseases (24%) 
  • Nutrition/dietary requirements (24%) 
  • Physical activity requirements (9%). 

Visit www.ifebp.org/GLP2025 for more information and to view the full survey report. 

Rebecca Plier

PR/Communications Specialist Favorite Foundation Product: The Talking Benefits podcast! What an engaging way to get timely benefits insights. Benefits-related Topics that Interest Her Most: Mental health, diversity, equity and inclusion, and workplace wellness. Personal Insight: When Rebecca isn’t diving headfirst into the world of benefits, she enjoys organizing her monthly book club and expanding her vinyl record collection.

Recommended Posts

The Multiemployer Retirement Plan Landscape Report: Defined Contribution Key Findings

Cathe Gooding, CEBS
 

The health of multiemployer defined contribution (DC) retirement plans improved from 2021 to 2023, according to The Multiemployer Retirement Plan Landscape: A 15-Year Look (2009-2023), recently released by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans.

Benefits to Grow and Support Families: A Ten-Year Look

Anne Patterson
 

Fertility, family planning and family support benefits have been steadily on the rise as employers seek to attract and retain talent, support workforce well-being and build more inclusive workplaces, according to the International Foundation’s Employee Benefits Survey: 2026 Report.

Supreme Court Rules in Withdrawal Liability Case

Kathy Bergstrom, CEBS
 

In a unanimous ruling on May 21, the Supreme Court affirmed a circuit court decision and held that pension plans have the flexibility to update actuarial assumptions after year-end when calculating withdrawal liability rather than fixing those assumptions at the close of the prior year.