In the early years of the shift from defined benefit (DB) to defined contribution (DC) plans, most attention was directed at saving for retirement. Today, there is a growing realization that more consideration must be given to decumulation—account withdrawals after retirement.

For workers who want to turn their retirement savings into a guaranteed stream of income, several options referred to as retirement income generators (RIGs) are available, with features that continue to evolve.

  1. Investment earnings. Invest the assets, leave the principal intact and spend just the interest and dividends received on the assets.
  2. Systematic withdrawals. Invest the assets, then use a structured approach to draw down the principal and investment earnings (e.g., a percentage of savings that may or may not be adjusted for inflation).
  3. Annuities. Transfer some or all of one’s savings (and longevity risk) to an insurance company that guarantees an income for a specified period of time or for life.

Learn more about decumulation strategies in these reports prepared by the Foundation.

The Path to Retirement Security in Canada
The Path to Retirement Security in Canada: How Employers and Plan Administrators Can Help (See page 51.)
The Path to Retirement Security in the U.S.
The Path to Retirement Security in the U.S. How Employers and Plan Sponsors Can Help (See page 40.)

Each option has pros and cons—and the income a retiree receives depends significantly on the strategy chosen. It is not uncommon for a combination of strategies to be the best choice. Unfortunately, the number of choices is so complicated that if they aren’t forced to do so, many individuals choose nothing.

The expenses individuals incur with decumulation are another concern. Too often, retirement savings are turned into annuities at retail prices, which can reduce a retiree’s income by as much as 30%. One exception is annuities for males in the U.S. purchased through DC plans—Federal law requires these annuities be priced on a unisex basis that doesn’t adjust for the fact than on average, women outlive men. For this reason, males with a DC plan in the U.S. may be able to purchase single life annuities at a lower price outside their workplace retirement plan than within their plan.

[Related: Decumulation | Benefit Bits Video]

Increasingly, plan sponsors and administrators are recognizing the importance of decumulation. They are:

  • Offering preretirees and retirees a limited menu of prescreened options for decumulation
  • Negotiating group pricing for annuities to better protect the assets of plan members and/or deliver more income than these persons would be able to get on their own via the retail market
  • Providing preretirees with information and guidance on the pros and cons of decumulation options, including the amount of retirement income it is reasonable to expect under different scenarios
  • Making a decumulation strategy the default distribution option for a DC plan to discourage lump-sum payouts at retirement.

The most popular choices among sponsors establishing default decumulation are annuities and the use of professionally managed accounts with systematic withdrawals.  A relatively new choice is a target-date fund that includes a decumulation feature—an effort by the financial industry to address multiple accumulation and decumulation issues with one product.

In Canada, the federal and provincial governments have established several default vehicles known as retirement income options (RIOs), where funds from registered retirement accounts must be moved when a saver wants to start making withdrawals. These RIOs have government-established annual minimum/maximum withdrawal amounts. Some RIOs also require the purchase of annuities by a specific age such as 71 or 80.

In the U.S., if a DC plan sponsor has an affiliated DB plan, another decumulation option is to transfer some or all of the participant’s DC funds to the DB plan under IRC Section 414(k).  The money from the DC plan is converted to an annuity payable from the DB plan.  Given the current low interest rates used by insurance companies when pricing annuities, the 414(k) transfer approach can provide a substantially higher lifetime retirement income to the plan participant without adding any measurable risk to the DB plans’ funding.

Need some help choosing RIGs, RIOs and their providers? The Foundation offers this checklist:

Choosing Retirement Income Options and Their Providers
U.S. (See Page 44, Exhibit 12)
Canada (See Page 55, Exhibit 11)


Pat Bonner, Ph.D., CEBS

Recommended Posts

Legal & Legislative Reporter: Medical Provider May Not Bring Claim on Behalf of Participants and Beneficiaries

Guest Contributor

Every month, the International Foundation releases the Legal and Legislative Reporter, a compilation of new employee benefits–related case summaries. Below is a summary we thought you’d be interested in. Content provided by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. The U.S. District Court for the […]

Five Steps to Nurture Belonging in the Workplace

Guest Contributor

Benefits Magazine Extras articles provide you with bonus content on a mix of benefits topics as well as deep dives and analyses on the latest benefit trends and compliance issues. Visit to see the latest Benefits Magazine Extras as well as the bimonthly print […]

Navigating Uncertainty

Christine Vazquez, CEBS

In today’s business environment, change is constant. Earning a Certified Employee Benefit Specialist® (CEBS®) designation can help benefits professionals improve their ability to manage organizational change. The self-study CEBS courses provide critical knowledge and skills to scan the environment and strategically tailor benefit […]

DOL Guidance on Mental Health Parity: Proposed Rules for NQTL Comparative Analyses

Jenny Gartman, CEBS

Many health plan sponsors continue to struggle to comply with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA), particularly the requirement to conduct a comparative analysis of nonquantitative treatment limitations (NQTLs) that has been effective under the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act […]