In the early years of the shift from defined benefit (DB) to defined contribution (DC) plans, most attention was directed at saving for retirement. Today, there is a growing realization that more consideration must be given to decumulation—account withdrawals after retirement.

6-9_Decumulation-Cracking-the-Retirement-Nest-Egg_Large
For workers who want to turn their retirement savings into a guaranteed stream of income, several options referred to as retirement income generators (RIGs) are available, with features that continue to evolve.

  1. Investment earnings. Invest the assets, leave the principal intact and spend just the interest and dividends received on the assets.
  2. Systematic withdrawals. Invest the assets, then use a structured approach to draw down the principal and investment earnings (e.g., a percentage of savings that may or may not be adjusted for inflation).
  3. Annuities. Transfer some or all of one’s savings (and longevity risk) to an insurance company that guarantees an income for a specified period of time or for life.

Learn more about decumulation strategies in these reports prepared by the Foundation.

The Path to Retirement Security in Canada
The Path to Retirement Security in Canada: How Employers and Plan Administrators Can Help (See page 51.)
The Path to Retirement Security in the U.S.
The Path to Retirement Security in the U.S. How Employers and Plan Sponsors Can Help (See page 40.)

Each option has pros and cons—and the income a retiree receives depends significantly on the strategy chosen. It is not uncommon for a combination of strategies to be the best choice. Unfortunately, the number of choices is so complicated that if they aren’t forced to do so, many individuals choose nothing.

The expenses individuals incur with decumulation are another concern. Too often, retirement savings are turned into annuities at retail prices, which can reduce a retiree’s income by as much as 30%. One exception is annuities for males in the U.S. purchased through DC plans—Federal law requires these annuities be priced on a unisex basis that doesn’t adjust for the fact than on average, women outlive men. For this reason, males with a DC plan in the U.S. may be able to purchase single life annuities at a lower price outside their workplace retirement plan than within their plan.

[Related: Decumulation | Benefit Bits Video]

Increasingly, plan sponsors and administrators are recognizing the importance of decumulation. They are:

  • Offering preretirees and retirees a limited menu of prescreened options for decumulation
  • Negotiating group pricing for annuities to better protect the assets of plan members and/or deliver more income than these persons would be able to get on their own via the retail market
  • Providing preretirees with information and guidance on the pros and cons of decumulation options, including the amount of retirement income it is reasonable to expect under different scenarios
  • Making a decumulation strategy the default distribution option for a DC plan to discourage lump-sum payouts at retirement.

The most popular choices among sponsors establishing default decumulation are annuities and the use of professionally managed accounts with systematic withdrawals.  A relatively new choice is a target-date fund that includes a decumulation feature—an effort by the financial industry to address multiple accumulation and decumulation issues with one product.

In Canada, the federal and provincial governments have established several default vehicles known as retirement income options (RIOs), where funds from registered retirement accounts must be moved when a saver wants to start making withdrawals. These RIOs have government-established annual minimum/maximum withdrawal amounts. Some RIOs also require the purchase of annuities by a specific age such as 71 or 80.

In the U.S., if a DC plan sponsor has an affiliated DB plan, another decumulation option is to transfer some or all of the participant’s DC funds to the DB plan under IRC Section 414(k).  The money from the DC plan is converted to an annuity payable from the DB plan.  Given the current low interest rates used by insurance companies when pricing annuities, the 414(k) transfer approach can provide a substantially higher lifetime retirement income to the plan participant without adding any measurable risk to the DB plans’ funding.

Need some help choosing RIGs, RIOs and their providers? The Foundation offers this checklist:

Choosing Retirement Income Options and Their Providers
U.S. (See Page 44, Exhibit 12)
Canada (See Page 55, Exhibit 11)

 

Pat Bonner, Ph.D., CEBS

Recommended Posts

Mental Health Parity: What Plan Sponsors Need to Know During Period of Nonenforcement of 2024 Final Rule

Kathy Bergstrom, CEBS
 

Following the announcement last month that the Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury will put a hold on enforcing the 2024 final rule on the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA), health plan sponsors […]

The New Look of Virtual Care: What’s Right for Employers and Plan Sponsors?

Guest Contributor
 

Benefits Magazine Extras articles provide you with bonus content on a mix of benefits topics as well as deep dives and analyses on the latest benefit trends and compliance issues. Visit ifebp.org/benefitsmagazine to see the latest Benefits Magazine Extras as well as the bimonthly print […]

Ontario’s New Long-Term Illness Leave Takes Effect Soon: What Employers Need to Know

Amanda Wilke, CEBS
 

On December 19, 2024, Ontario’s Working for Workers Six Act, 2024 (Bill 229) received Royal Assent. Amongst the changes in the bill amending the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA), was the introduction of unpaid long-term illness leave, effective June 19, 2025. While the law […]