By: Lois Mathis-Gleason, CEBS

​The Affordable Care Act is big … and complicated … but there is another complicated act, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act​ (MHPAEA), that health administrators must act on very soon. 


John Barlament, partner at Quarles & Brady LLP in Milwaukee, served up this series of sobering messages to the Milwaukee Chapter of the International Society of Employee Benefit Specialists (ISCEBS) on October 21, 2014 at an event hosted by The Benefit Services Group in Pewaukee, Wisconsin:​

  • The MHPAEA regulations were finalized in November 2013.
  • They are effective for calendar-year plans on January 1, 2015.
  • They are more complicated than the Affordable Care Act’s Play or Pay​ provisions (Yikes!).
  • The Internal Revenue Service levies fines of $100 per day per affected individual for plans out of compliance, and it requires plans to self-report violations.
  • Even if a plan does not self-report, there are plaintiffs’ attorneys who are very aware of these final regulations and know how difficult it can be for plans to comply.

Not many would argue this law doesn’t have good goals. In the past, individuals were not always able to obtain the coverage they needed to adequately treat mental health and/or substance use disorders because of health plan limits on things like dollar amounts of coverage, number of covered treatments, visits or days of treatment. Limits applied to mental health and substance use disorder treatments were often more restrictive than limits applied to major medical/surgical physical treatments. 

​[Related: Worksite Wellness: Moving Beyond the
Physical Dimension

​To correct this imbalance, MHPAEA requires health plans providing mental health and/or substance use disorder benefits to offer coverage that is not more restrictive or stringent than coverage applying to major medical/surgical treatments. (HIPAA-excepted benefits including dental, vision, health FSAs and EAPs are not subject to MHPAEA.)

Determining whether the limits a plan applies to mental health and substance use disorder benefits are actually more restrictive than the limits applied to major medical/surgical coverage is not easy.

​​[Related: Certificate in Health and Welfare Plans​]

Each plan must predict next year’s claims, analyze both its quantitative treatment limitations and its non-quantitative treatment limitations, and determine the level of coverage needed to make sure its mental health and substance use disorder benefits are in parity with its major medical and surgical benefits.

Each plan needs to do separate analyses on these six types of coverage:

  • Inpatient, in-network​
  • Inpatient, out-of-network
  • Outpatient, in-network
  • Outpatient, out-of-network
  • Emergency care
  • Prescription drugs.

The more levels of coinsurance or copayments a plan has, the more complicated it gets. The analyses are based not only on the terms of the plan document, but also on the plan’s claims experience.

Due to the complexity of the calculations, mental health treatment must sometimes be covered more generously than major medical/surgical treatment in order to comply with MHPAEA, which may be surprising.

Between the Affordable Care Act and the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, health plan administrators face quite a challenge getting their “acts” together this year.

Additional Resources:

CMS Fact Sheet

Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008, Federal Register, November 13, 2013

Washington Update – Final Regulations Implementing Mental Health Parity Requirements, Benefits Magazine, February 2014​

The Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration Resources:

Updated Mental Health Parity Part of the Self Compliance Tool

Mental Health Parity Provisions Questions and Answers in the updated Compliance Assistance Guide

Have specific questions about MHPAEA? Contact our personalized research from the Information Center (Exclusive International Foundation​ and International Society member service).


Lois Gleason, CEBS

Instructional Designer at the International Foundation 

Favorite Foundation Product: Employee Benefits Survey (conducted every two years; it is very comprehensive).

Benefits-Related Topic Top Picks: The changing landscape of America’s costly health care system, ERISA compliance, retirement decumulation strategies.

Favorite Things About Working at the Foundation: My co-workers and how much they care about the quality of their work product. I also love, love, love all the windows in our office with their beautiful views of trees and sky.

Personal Insight: I am constantly reading. I can relate to the flaws, strengths, and silly inconsistencies found in the characters of classic novels like Middlemarch, North and South, and A Tale of Two Cities. I also read the daily newspapers every morning at breakfast–and yes, I still get the paper versions. Because it’s no big deal if a little coffee spills on them.

Recommended Posts

The State of Multiemployer Health Plans: Ten Takeaways

Justin Held, CEBS

The median cost of benefits for multiemployer health plans increased 4.7% from 2017 to 2018, reaching $11,642 per participant per year (PPPY), according to a new International Foundation report. The consistent increases in costs over the ten-year period required increases in employer […]

Where We Are Now: Special Financial Assistance Under the American Rescue Plan Act

Kathy Bergstrom, CEBS

From capital market return expectations to the rules that cover the program, a lot has changed in the two years since the American Rescue Plan Act was signed into law and created the Special Financial Assistance (SFA) program for struggling multiemployer pension […]

Education Benefits for Recruiting and Building Talent

Anne Patterson

Could education benefits help your organization recruit and retain talent? Tune into the latest Talking Benefits episode to get “schooled” on the various options available to employers in this area. The episode covers: Give it a listen to find out how your […]