Vaping in the Workplace: Do You Have a Policy?

As the use of e-cigarettes grows, employers are faced with a new question: Do you allow vaping in the workplace? While smoking is officially banned from most workplaces, many organizations do not yet have formal policies in place around e-cigarette use.

Vaping in the Workplace: Do You Have a Policy?

E-cigarettes (or electronic cigarettes) are any electronic device that can be used to deliver nicotine or other substances to the person inhaling from the device. They come in many shapes and sizes and may look like regular cigarettes, cigars or pipes or resemble items such as pens or USB sticks. Using an e-cigarette is commonly called vaping.

According to the CDC, as of September 30, 2018, ten states (California, Delaware, Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah and Vermont), the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have passed comprehensive smoke-free indoor air laws that ban e-cigarettes in any place where smoking is banned. These laws prohibit smoking and the use of e-cigarettes in indoor areas of private worksites, restaurants and bars.

Other states have passed laws that prohibit smoking (including e-cigarettes) in specific establishments, such as schools, correctional facilities and sports arenas.

For most states, it’s not clear whether the state’s laws on smoking in indoor workplaces also encompass vaping. However, some cities and local governments have passed laws specifically addressing e-cigarettes the same as traditional cigarettes.


How is your organization handling vaping in the workplace? Please share in the poll below!

Does Your Workplace Have a Policy That Bans Vaping at Work?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

If you’re wondering about the rules in your state around vaping in the workplace, check out this helpful guide from the Public Health Law Center at Mitchell Hamline School of Law, which covers smoke-free restrictions: U.S. E-Cigarette Regulation: A 50-State Review.

If your state does not have specific e-cigarette laws, the option is yours, as an employer, to decide whether to ban vaping at work.

If a workplace vaping policy isn’t something your organization has addressed yet, consider making it a priority for the future. As an employer, you’ll want to consider the pros and cons of e-cigarette use and examine how it fits into your company’s culture and goals.

If you make any changes to your policy, be sure to communicate them clearly and in advance with your employees by updating your employee handbook (if you have one) and by posting and distributing the new policy to employees. Plan to give about three months of advance notice before implementing any new workplace policies.


Brenda Hofmann
Communications Manager at the International Foundation

The latest from Word on Benefits:

Staff

Communications Manager at the International Foundation

Favorite Foundation Product: The Word on Benefits Blog

Benefits-Related Topics That Grab Her Attention: Wellness, work/life balance, retirement security, parental leave policies and unique and trending perks.​

Favorite Foundation Event:The day we wait all year forNational Employee Benefits Day!

Personal Insight: Brenda goes with the flow and this approach to life puts everyone around her at ease. Brenda enjoys the mix of roles she plays from public relations pro to mom and wife.

Recommended Posts

GLP-1 Drug Coverage Continues to Rise in Canada 

Rebecca Plier
 

New Survey Data Reveals Prior Authorization or Other Utilization Management Strategies, Eligibility Requirements, Annual Maximum as Leading Cost Control Methods  A new survey report from the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans reveals updated Canadian employer coverage and cost-control mechanisms surrounding glucagon-like […]

GLP-1 Drugs Responsible for Over Ten Percent of Annual Claims 

Rebecca Plier
 

New Survey Data Reveals Rise of GLP-1 Drug Claims, With Utilization Management and Eligibility Requirements as Leading Cost-Control Mechanisms   A new survey report from the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans reveals updated U.S. employer coverage and claims representation surrounding glucagon-like peptide-1 […]

Mental Health Parity: Four Compliance Documents to Reference During Period of Nonenforcement for the 2024 Final Rule

Jenny Gartman, CEBS
 

The Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury announced on May 15, 2025 that they will not enforce the portions of the 2024 final rule implementing the nonquantitative treatment limitation (NQTL) comparative analyses requirements under the Mental Health Parity […]