About Lois Mathis-Gleason, CEBS
Manager, Reference/Research Services at the International Foundation

Defined contribution pension plan administrators now have a two-month grace period for issuing annual participant-level plan disclosures.

The term “at least annually thereafter” now means “at least once in any 14-month period,” and defined contribution plan administrators are rejoicing. Oddly enough, defining annually to mean within 14 months rather than within 12 months makes sense in this circumstance. Let me explain.

Administrators of participant-directed plans such as 401(k)s must furnish detailed information to every participant and beneficiary regarding the plan and its available investment alternatives. Department of Labor (DOL) regulations require these participant-level disclosures be made “on or before the date on which a participant or beneficiary can first direct his or her investments and at least annually thereafter.” The regulations state, “At least annually thereafter means at least once in any 12-month period, without regard to whether the plan operates on a calendar or fiscal year basis.”

Some of the information plan administrators need to provide to participants can only be obtained from the plan’s service providers. Service providers are required to supply annual disclosures to plan administrators under ERISA section 408(b)(2). The timing of the first required service provider disclosures to plans led the DOL to set August 30, 2012, as the first deadline for participant-level disclosures for calendar year plans. (This was 60 days after the first service provider disclosures were due to plans). As a result, annual disclosures would have to be sent to participants and beneficiaries on or before August 30 in following years, whether or not that timing was practical or cost-efficient. Plan administrators lamented and notified the DOL of their timing concerns.

[Related: 61st U.S. Annual Employee Benefits Conference]

In 2013, the DOL issued Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB) 2013-02, granting each plan the right to reset its participant-level disclosure due date one time in either 2013 or 2014, allowing up to 18 months instead of 12 months between the disclosures that one time. Following the reset, future annual deadlines would again be 12 months after the prior year’s disclosure was sent.

FAB 2013-02 also clarified that “at least annually thereafter” meant no more than 365 days after the date of the previous disclosure. This strict interpretation of “annually” meant that if any plan sent out disclosures a little bit early one year, it would be obligated to send them out just as early the following year, allowing due dates to creep up over time.  Plan administrators also anticipated problems adhering to the strict 365-day rule if their service providers were even a little bit late in providing information necessary for the annual participant-level disclosures.

To alleviate these problems, the DOL issued a direct final rule, which took effect on June 17, 2015. The rule changes the definition of “at least annually thereafter” to mean at least once in any 14-month period instead of once in a 12-month period. This is welcome news for most plan administrators, allowing some give-and-take between deadlines from year to year.


DOL Fact Sheet:  “Direct Final Rule Provides Flexibility for the Timing of Annual Disclosures to Workers in 401(k)-Type Retirement Plans.”

Lois Gleason, CEBS

Senior Information/Research Specialist at the International Foundation

Favorite Foundation service/product: The Employee Benefits Survey (conducted every few years; it is very comprehensive)

Benefits-related topic top picks: Affordable Care Act, multiemployer pension plans

Favorite Foundation conference moment: Working the bookstore/information center at the Employee Benefit Symposium and meeting our members Personal Insight: When she’s away from work, Lois likes to dive into 19th century Brit lit novels by Dickens, Eliot, Hardy and the Bronte sisters. These works are spicy and action-packed when compared to the employee benefit rules and regulations she reviews all day.

Recommended Posts

New Mental Health Parity Guidance: More Clarity, But More Compliance Obligations

Anne Newhouse

According to speaker John Barlament, Shareholder, Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren, S.C., in his webcast “New Mental Health Parity Guidance: More Clarity, But More Compliance Obligations,” held on August 30, 2023, new guidance has been “desperately needed” on the topic of mental health […]

Legal & Legislative Reporter: Medical Provider May Not Bring Claim on Behalf of Participants and Beneficiaries

Guest Contributor

Every month, the International Foundation releases the Legal and Legislative Reporter, a compilation of new employee benefits–related case summaries. Below is a summary we thought you’d be interested in. Content provided by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. The U.S. District Court for the […]

Five Steps to Nurture Belonging in the Workplace

Guest Contributor

Benefits Magazine Extras articles provide you with bonus content on a mix of benefits topics as well as deep dives and analyses on the latest benefit trends and compliance issues. Visit ifebp.org/benefitsmagazine to see the latest Benefits Magazine Extras as well as the bimonthly print […]

Navigating Uncertainty

Christine Vazquez, CEBS

In today’s business environment, change is constant. Earning a Certified Employee Benefit Specialist® (CEBS®) designation can help benefits professionals improve their ability to manage organizational change. The self-study CEBS courses provide critical knowledge and skills to scan the environment and strategically tailor benefit […]