By: Lois Mathis-Glea​​son, CEBS

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) gave health plans an extraordinary amount of new reporting and disclosure requirements. However, one preexisting requirement (pun intended) will disappear beginning January 1, 2015: The HIPAA Certificate of Creditable Coverage.  

HIPAA-Cert-Cov-BIG_814.jpg

​​Health plans had to provide these certificates to individuals losing health coverage so the individuals could prove they had creditable health coverage, reducing or eliminating any preexisting condition exclusion periods in the next health plan they joined. Starting with plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, the ACA prohibited preexisting exclusion periods for all health plans (grandfathered and nongrandfathered). As a result, no certificates of creditable coverage need to be issued on or after December 31, 2014.

 [Related: Watch for new ACA FAQs added weekly in ACA University]

Health plans should continue providing these certificates to individuals whose coverage terminates before December 31, 2014, in case anyone needs to offset a preexisting condition exclusion when joining a noncalendar health plan during a plan year that began before January 1, 2014.​

So, at your 2014 New Year’s Eve party, feel free to sing “Auld Lang Syne” to HIPAA certificates of creditable coverage, thanks to the Affordable Care Act! (But don’t forget to usher in that pesky “Play or Pay” employer mandate along with the 2015 new year.)

Note: Employers may need to provide proof of coverage and ending date for employees over age 65 (or disabled and under 65) who delayed enrolling in Medicare Part B so they can avoid penalties when they do enroll.
 
For purposes of Medicare drug coverage (Medicare Part D), employers must continue notifying Medicare eligible policyholders whether their prescription drug coverage is creditable coverage, which means that the coverage is expected to pay on average as much as the standard Medicare prescription drug coverage. See the CMS web page on Creditable Coverage for more information.​

Resource:

Ninety-Day Waiting Period Limitation and Technical Amendments to Certain Health Coverage Requirements Under the Affordable Care Act, Final Rule, Federal Register, February 24, 2014

 

Lois Gleason, CEBS

Senior Information/Research Specialist

Favorite Foundation service/product: The Employee Benefits Survey (conducted every few years; it is very comprehensive)

Benefits-related topic top picks: Affordable Care Act, multiemployer pension plans

Favorite Foundation conference moment: Working the bookstore/information center at the Employee Benefit Symposium and meeting our members

Personal Insight: When she’s away from work, Lois likes to dive into  19th century Brit lit novels by Dickens, Eliot, Hardy and the Bronte sisters. These works are spicy and action-packed when compared to the employee benefit rules and regulations she reviews all day.

Recommended Posts

Workplace Accommodations: Compliance Issues and Tips 

Anne Newhouse, CEBS
 

Injuries and sicknesses resulting in disability and, potentially, time away from work happen to employees all the time requiring employers to develop a disability management process. This process is a series of coordinated stages to prevent, manage, and reduce workplace disabilities, alleviate […]

Open pharmacy pill containers on a pile of 20 dollar bills.

What the Executive Order Increasing PBM Fee Transparency Means for Employers

Amanda Wilke, CEBS
 

On April 15, 2025, President Trump signed the executive order (EO) “Lowering Drug Prices by Once Again Putting Americans First,” which includes specific actions to be taken by federal agencies to reduce prescription drug costs, improve transparency and increase competition in the […]

GLP-1 Drug Coverage Continues to Rise in Canada 

Rebecca Plier
 

New Survey Data Reveals Prior Authorization or Other Utilization Management Strategies, Eligibility Requirements, Annual Maximum as Leading Cost Control Methods  A new survey report from the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans reveals updated Canadian employer coverage and cost-control mechanisms surrounding glucagon-like […]