401(k) Hardship Withdrawals: No More Six-Month Contribution Suspensions

In September 2019, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Treasury issued final regulations easing restrictions on hardship distributions from defined contribution retirement plans. While there were a number of important changes in the regulations, this blog focuses on changes regarding suspension of employees’ contributions after hardship withdrawals.

Beginning January 1, 2020, plans are prohibited from requiring suspensions on contributions for participants who take hardship withdrawals.

401(k) Hardship Withdrawals: No More Six-Month Contribution Suspensions

Background on Hardship Withdrawals

In general, retirement plan participants in 401(k), 403(b) and 457(b) plans are not allowed to receive money from their account until they separate from service with their employer or reach age 59½ .

However, the IRS allows retirement plans to let participants withdraw money before separating from service or reaching age 59½ if they have an immediate and heavy financial need. These withdrawals are called hardship distributions. Hardship distributions reduce the amount of money available to participants at retirement and can undermine the purpose of retirement accounts. To discourage the overuse of hardship withdrawals, the IRS lays out specific conditions that participants and retirement plans must meet.

Health Benefits Conference & Expo

Old Rule: Six-Month Suspension of Contributions

Before the September 2019 final regulations, one condition the IRS required was that participants who took a hardship withdrawal were not allowed to make further contributions to their retirement accounts until six months after the withdrawal. In other words, retirement plans had to suspend participant contributions for six months.

In practice, this had unintended consequences that further undermined the retirement security of participants making hardship withdrawals. Here’s how.

  1. Participants missed out on six months’ worth of contributions and on all compounded earnings that would have resulted from those contributions.
  2. If the plan offered matching employer contributions, participants also lost out on the match for six months and its compounded earnings.
  3. Because they were not contributing to their retirement plan for six months, participants became accustomed to receiving higher take-home pay. They often found it challenging to resume contributions after six months and watch their take-home pay decrease. It was less painful to delay resuming regular contributions or stop contributing altogether.

New Rule: Suspension of Contributions No Longer Allowed

The September 2019 final regulations addressed these concerns. Beginning January 1, 2020, plans can no longer require suspensions on contributions for participants who take hardship withdrawals. The IRS flipped the script from requiring suspensions to prohibiting them. This should improve participants’ retirement security and make hardship distributions easier for retirement plans to administer.

[Learn More: ​Defined Contribution Plans Online Course]

Other Hardship Withdrawal Changes

Besides eliminating the six-month suspension on contributions, the September 2019 hardship regulations made other changes. These include:

  • Allowing plans to eliminate the requirement that participants take plan loans before a hardship distribution
  • Allowing hardship withdrawals to draw on more than just participant contributions
  • Revising other aspects of determining whether a hardship exists and whether a withdrawal is financially necessary.

You can learn more about these changes in the resources listed below.

Lois Gleason, CEBS
E-Learning/Online Course Instructional Designer at the International Foundation

CEBS

The latest from Word on Benefits:

Lois Gleason, CEBS

Instructional Designer at the International Foundation  Favorite Foundation Product: Employee Benefits Survey (conducted every two years; it is very comprehensive). Benefits-Related Topic Top Picks: The changing landscape of America’s costly health care system, ERISA compliance, retirement decumulation strategies. Favorite Things About Working at the Foundation: My co-workers and how much they care about the quality of their work product. I also love, love, love all the windows in our office with their beautiful views of trees and sky. Personal Insight: I am constantly reading. I can relate to the flaws, strengths, and silly inconsistencies found in the characters of classic novels like Middlemarch, North and South, and A Tale of Two Cities. I also read the daily newspapers every morning at breakfast–and yes, I still get the paper versions. Because it’s no big deal if a little coffee spills on them.

Recommended Posts

Mental Health Parity: What Plan Sponsors Need to Know During Period of Nonenforcement of 2024 Final Rule

Kathy Bergstrom, CEBS
 

Following the announcement last month that the Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury will put a hold on enforcing the 2024 final rule on the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA), health plan sponsors […]

The New Look of Virtual Care: What’s Right for Employers and Plan Sponsors?

Guest Contributor
 

Benefits Magazine Extras articles provide you with bonus content on a mix of benefits topics as well as deep dives and analyses on the latest benefit trends and compliance issues. Visit ifebp.org/benefitsmagazine to see the latest Benefits Magazine Extras as well as the bimonthly print […]

Ontario’s New Long-Term Illness Leave Takes Effect Soon: What Employers Need to Know

Amanda Wilke, CEBS
 

On December 19, 2024, Ontario’s Working for Workers Six Act, 2024 (Bill 229) received Royal Assent. Amongst the changes in the bill amending the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA), was the introduction of unpaid long-term illness leave, effective June 19, 2025. While the law […]