The Status of the FFCRA Specific to Paid Leave

When the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) was initially released on March 18, 2020 and required employers with fewer than 500 employees to provide paid sick leave and expanded the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), most of us probably thought—and hoped—the FFCRA was a temporary measure to get employers through the next couple of months. Here we are in October, still dealing with the same issues and ready for a return of more normal times.

There have been some recent revisions to the FFCRA that employers and plan sponsors should be addressing in their paid leave procedures. These may affect some employers more than others, with some of the changes more critical than others as well.

The Status of the FFCRA Specific to Paid Leave

What Has Happened Recently?

The Department of Labor (DOL) published and regularly updates a dedicated questions & answers (Q&A) web page that currently stands at 103 Q&As. The most recent additions were published on September 11, 2020, when the DOL released a temporary rule containing revisions and clarifications after a decision on August 3, 2020 by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York that found portions of the regulations invalid. The temporary rule went into effect on September 16, 2020 and, as a result, plan sponsors should review their procedures and ensure that they are as up to date as possible.

66th Annual Employee Benefits Conference Virtual Conference

The court ruling impacted four FFCRA leave provisions, some directly involved with employers bringing employees back to offices just as schools were reopening:

  • The definition of health care providers who may be denied leave
  • The requirement that an employer have work available for an employee taking leave
  • The requirement that employers consent to intermittent leave
  • The requirement that employees provide documentation for leave before taking leave.

In addition, on September 18, 2020 the DOL issued an information collection notice seeking comments from plan sponsors on the administration of the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act (EPSLA) and the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act (EFMLEA).

Definition of Health Care Providers

The revision of the term “health care provider” is much narrower than the original, which the court said left too many employees exempt from FFCRA rules. The new rule defines a health care provider as:

  • An employee who meets the definition of health care provider under the FMLA
  • Those employed to provide diagnostic services, preventive services, treatment services or other services that are integrated with and necessary to provide patient care and if not provided would adversely affect patients.

If an employer provides health care services and previously excluded employees from being able to take FFCRA leave, the employer should conduct an assessment to determine whether each employee is truly a health care provider under the revised definition. Employees who work for an employer that provides health care services may not be directly involved in providing those services and would therefore not be eligible for FFCRA leave.

Work Availability Standard

The new rule clarifies that to be eligible to take any FFCRA paid sick leave or FMLA leave, a person must be:

  • an active employee, and
  • cannot be furloughed or working reduced hours.

If an employer is letting employees who are furloughed or working very few hours take FFCRA leave for hours they would not usually be at work, they will have to stop this policy. In addition, the employee’s FFCRA qualifying event must be the only reason they cannot work. Generally, employers will not have to retroactively offer every furloughed employee FFCRA leave.

[Upcoming Webcast: Targeted Strategies for Best Quality Cancer Care, Sponsored by CVS Health | October 21, 2020 | Register Now!]

Intermittent Leave

In the original rule, FFCRA allowed employees to take leave on an intermittent basis as long as it did not pose a public health risk. This situation could be used, for example, when an employee needs to use intermittent leave to care for a child whose school or child-care facility had closed for COVID-19 reasons. The process required the employer to agree first to the intermittent leave, and then both parties had to plan prior to the leave to determine how it would be implemented.

Based on the revised ruling, employers must allow employees to take intermittent FFCRA on demand but encourages flexibility for employers and employees to collaborate and meet the needs of all involved.

Leave Documentation

The recordkeeping requirements for FFCRA leave includes both the employee’s notification of the requested leave and the documentation supporting the leave. The initial rule required employees to provide advance documentation of the leave, however, the revision allows for documentation “as soon as practicable.” An employer may deny an employee’s request for leave for failure to provide notice but should first give the employee an opportunity to provide documentation to substantiate the leave.

The documentation should include:

  • employer’s name
  • date(s) of the requested leave
  • qualifying reason for the leave
  • written statement that the employee is unable to work or telework.

Oral statements from the employee are allowed, however, the employer should still create written documentation. In addition, the employer must retain the documentation related to the paid leave request for four years.

Learn More about the FFCRA

Read more in the previous International Foundation Word on Benefits posts on the FFCRA:

Resources:
FFCRA Updates, Ballard Spahr, September 14, 2020


Anne Newhouse, CEBS
Information/Research Specialist at the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans

Public Employee Benefits Institute

The latest from Word on Benefits:

Anne Newhouse

Information/Research Specialist at the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Favorite Foundation Service: The Information Center! Members having the ability to have an information specialist research their topic is a great benefit. Favorite Foundation Moment: Attending the 2013 CEBS conferment ceremony in Boston as an official CEBS graduate. Benefits Related Topics That Interest Her Most: Benefit communication—helping employers understand what employees want and the way they want it communicated to them. Personal Insight: Anne may spend her days in the International Foundation employee benefits library, patiently researching answers to member questions—but after work, she’s ready to move with a bike, hike or walk in the great outdoors.

Recommended Posts

Educating DC Plan Participants for the Long Hike to Retirement

Kathy Bergstrom, CEBS
 

Many years ago, I visited Grand Canyon National Park with my mom and aunt. It was unseasonably hot, but I wanted to walk down into the canyon on the Bright Angel Trail. My companions were not up for the hike, so I […]

Building and Designing for DEI: Creating Employee Benefits That Work for All

Guest Contributor
 

Benefits Magazine Extras articles provide you with bonus content on a mix of benefits topics as well as deep dives and analyses on the latest benefit trends and compliance issues. Foundation members can visit ifebp.org/benefitsmagazine to view the full bimonthly print edition of the magazine.  Global […]